The Shia will oftentimes use Taqiyyah (lying to save one’s religion) when asked about Matam (the act of self-flagellation during the Shia Remembrance of Muharram). We often hear Shia, particularly in the West (and Asia), saying that beating oneself during Matam is actually forbidden in the Shia religion, and that it is only ignorant and “extremist” Shia who do that.

This is a bold-faced lie, and we shall prove it here. In fact, the opposite is true:

Any Shia who claims that self-flagellation is not Mustahabb (highly recommended) is either lying or ignorant of his religion. All of the Shia Maraje’(high scholars) agreed that beating oneself is not only allowed in Shi’ism, but rather it is encouraged.

Shia High Scholars Who Encourage Self-Flagellation

Let us refer the reader to Ayatollah Shirazi’s official website. Again, this is his own website, where he cites his as well as the opinion of other Shia Maraje’ (high scholars), including Ayatollah Sistani, Ayatollah al-Kho’i, and many other leading Shia figures.

Ayatollah Shirazi is one of the most revered scholars of the Shia, and nobody could question his credentials. His official website can be viewed at www.shirazi.org.uk* . In particular, we would like to draw the reader’s attention to his fatwa in regards to Matam, which can be found here: http://www.shirazi.org.uk/tatbir%20fatawa.htm . We simply copied and pasted it all below.

*Since many such fatwas have been exposed & refuted on the websites of Ahlussunnah, many official English websites of Shia Maraje’ (high scholars) have been taken down.







As for the Ahlus Sunnah, they are saddened by the wrongful death of Hussain (رضّى الله عنه). He is one of the many great heroes of Islam that died in the Name of Allah. However, the Ahlus Sunnah does not engage in self-flagellation or self-mutilation, which are both considered strictly Haram (forbidden).



The Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) forbade barbaric practises like such, and he said:
“He is NOT amongst us who slaps his face or tears his dress.”






Do the Shia really think that Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would appreciate people engaging in self-flagellation and self-mutilation?

If Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) were alive today, he would think that these people have lost their minds. We ask the reader if he would want his family to commemorate his own death in such a manner? No sane person would want his death commemorated in such a manner, no matter how unfair or how violent his own death was. So why do the Shia assume that Hussain (رضّى الله عنه) would want his death to be remembered in such a barbaric way?

This was a practice of the Jahiliyyah Arabs and the Prophet (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) forbade it, as well as the Quran.

Allah Almighty condemns the pagans for the barbaric way in which they would worship:
“Their [pagan] prayer at the House (of Allah) was nothing but whistling and clapping of hands; therefore taste the punishment because you used to disbelieve!” (Quran, 8:35)

Indeed Matam/ Tatbir of Shias during Ashura even contradicts what Ali (radiallahu anhu) said in one of the most authoratative books considered by the Shia – Nahjul Balagha – Sermon 233.



Extracted from: "Ashura (Matam/ Tatbir)" by Devil's Deception of Shi'ism

It was in Ramadan 60 AH that the letters from Kufah started to arrive in Makkah, at the house of al-Abbas ibn Abd al-Muttalib (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu), where al-Husayn ibn ‘Ali (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) was staying after his flight from Madinah. The letters were urging him to lead the Kufans into revolt against Yazid ibn Mu’awiyah, and assuring him of their loyalty and allegiance. Mu’awiyah (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) had died two months earlier, and there was much resentment for his son Yazid for whom the Bay’ah was taken as his (Mu’awiyah’s) successor. The people of Kufah especially were looking to al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) for leadership, and soon there was stream of letters coming in from Kufah with messages that enthusiastically described the support he would receive from the Kufans.




Kufah was a unique place, and the Kufans a peculiar people. In 37 AH ‘Ali (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) shifted his capital from Madinah to Kufah, and ever since, that city became the home of those who claimed partisanship of the Ahl al-Bayt. After the reconciliation between al-Hasan (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) and Mu’awiyah (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) in 41 AH, many of those who had been in al-Hasan’s (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) army settled in Kufah. At the time of Mu’awiyah’s (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) death in 60 AH pro-’Ali sentiments were still to be found in abundance in Kufah. Thus, when the opportunity arose, the Kufans who still regarded themselves as the Shi’ah (supporters) of the Ahl al-Bayt, turned to al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) to lead them against Yazid.

Al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) decided to send his cousin Muslim ibn ‘Aqil to investigate the situation in Kufah. If he found it feasible he would write to inform al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu), who would depart with his family from Makkah to join him there.

Muslim arrived in the month of Dhul-Qa’dah and when the Kufans learnt of his arrival, they presented themselves for the pledge. Soon there were 12,000 Kufans who had given their solemn oath to support and protect al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) with their lives and all they possessed. When this number rose to 18,000, Muslim felt confident enough to dispatch a messenger to al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) informing him of the Bay’ah of the Kufans, and urging him to proceed from Makkah.

Rumors of what was happening in Kufah soon reached Yazid in Damascus. He immediately replaced Nu’man ibn Bashir (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu), the governor of Kufah, with the ruthless Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad, with orders to find Muslim ibn ‘Aqil and kill him. Ibn Ziyad entered Kufah early in Dhul-Hijjah, accompanied by seventeen men on horseback. With the end of his turban drawn over his face he was unrecognizable, and the people of Kufah, who were expecting al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu), mistook Ibn Ziyad for al-Husayn. “Peace be upon you, o son of Rasulullah,” they hailed him. Thus it was that Ibn Ziyad learnt the truth of the rumors. It was only when one of his mounted men shouted at them, “Stand back! This is the governor Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad!” that the Kufans realized the seriousness of their blunder.

Ibn Ziyad sent a servant with a bag containing 3000 dirhams to pose as a newcomer from Syria eager to join the revolution and thereby discover the whereabouts of Muslim ibn ‘Aqil. This betrayer located Muslim in the house of Hani ibn Urwah and took the pledge of allegiance at his hands. After staying with them for a few days he returned to Ibn Ziyad and informed him about their intrigue. Hani ibn Urwah was arrested. At first Hani denied all knowledge of Muslim, but when the “newcomer from Hims” was brought before him, he confessed, but still he refused to reveal the whereabout of Muslim ibn ‘Aqil.

In the meantime, Muslim came to hear about the arrest of Hani ibn Urwah. Realizing that the hour for a decisive encounter had arrived, Muslim raised his battle cry “Ya Mansur”. In response to his battle cry, 4000 men who had given (him) their oath of allegiance and loyalty to al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) gathered around him and proceeded towards the governor’s fort.

Seeing the Kufans with Muslim ibn ‘Aqil at his gate, Ibn Ziyad sent some of the tribal leaders of Kufah to speak to them. The tribal leaders threatened them with severe punishment if they would pursue their revolt with Muslim ibn ‘Aqil. Hence the mothers and fathers of the men discouraged them to go ahead with Muslim. In this way the resolve of the men who had taken a sacred oath of allegiance and pledged loyalty to al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) proved to be cowards and deserted Muslim ibn ‘Aqil. Each followed the other and by sunset Muslim was left with only 30 men.

He led them in Maghrib prayer, and then moved away to the gateway of the Kindah quarter of Kufah. He went through the gate with no more than 10 men, and before he knew it, he was on his own (alone) in the streets of Kufah. Of all those who had so anxiously and enthusiastically written to al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) to come and lead them in revolt against Yazid, and out of the 18,000 men who just days before placed their right hands in his solemnly pledging allegiance to the cause for which they had invited the grandson of Rasulullah, not a single one was there to offer Muslim ibn ‘Aqil the solace of their company or refuge from the night.

Eventually, parched with thirst, he knocked at a door. The occupant, an old lady, took him in. When she learnt that he was Muslim ibn ‘Aqil, she hid him away in her house, but her son, from whom she extracted a promise not to tell anyone of his presence there, waited only till the morning to take the news to the governor’s residence. The next thing Muslim realized was that the house was surrounded. Thrice he managed with his sword to drive the attackers out of the house, but when they started putting fire to the house he was forced to face them outside. It was only when Abd ar-Rahman ibn Muhammad ibn al-Ash’ath, one of those sent to arrest him, promised him safety, that he lowered his sword. It was a mistake; they took away his sword and he was taken to Ibn Ziyad. Muslim knew his death was at hand. Tears flowed from his eyes, not at his own fate, but at the thought of al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) and his family traveling through the harsh, merciless desert towards a fate more harsh and merciless, to an enemy firmly resolved to bring an end to his venture, and the most treacherous of partisans whose desertion at the hour of need had brought his (Muslim ibn ‘Aqil) life to this tragic end. He begged Ibn al-Ash’ath to send someone to al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) with the following message: “Ibn ‘Aqil has sent me to you. He says to you: ‘Go back with your family. Do not be deceived by the people of Kufah. They are those same supporters of your father from whom he so dearly wished to part, by death or by being killed. The Kufans have lied to me and have lied to you, and a liar has no sense.’”

Later that day, the Day of Arafah (the 9th of Dhul-Hijjah), Muslim ibn ‘Aqil was taken up to the highest ramparts of the fort. As he was being led up, he recited the Tahleel, Tasbeeh, Takbeer and Istighfar. His last words reflect his intense disappointment with the people of Kufah, “O Allah, You be the Judge between us and our people. They deceived us and deserted us.” From high upon the ramparts his head fell down in the dust, in full view of those whose invitations and oaths of allegiance had given him so much hope, but whose cowardice and treachery had left him with nothing but despair.

Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad had entered Kufah with only seventeen men. For each man that came with him there was over a thousand who had taken the oath of allegiance at the hands of Muslim ibn ‘Aqil, yet not a single sword was raised in his defense. Not a single voice had the courage to protest his execution. And these were the same men who had been telling al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) , “Come, we are with you.”

Meanwhile upon receiving Muslim’s letter, al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) started making arrangements to travel to Kufah. He immediately dispatched a messenger, Qays ibn Mus-hir, to inform the Kufans of his imminent arrival. This messenger was captured by Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad, who ordered him to mount the walls of the fort and publicly curse al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) and his father. Instead he praised ‘Ali (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) and al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu), telling the Kufans that al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) was on his way. He exhorted them to assist him as they had promised. He ended his brief address by imprecating curses upon Ibn Ziyad. Despite this impassioned plea, the men of Kufah were unmoved. Upon the order of Ibn Ziyad he was flung from the ramparts and killed.

In Makkah, a number of the eminent Sahabah and their children tried to dissuade al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) from going to Kufah, reminding him of the fickleness of the Kufans in regards to both his father and his brother. ‘Abdullah ibn Abbas, ‘Abdullah ibn ‘Umar, Jabir ibn ‘Abdullah, Abu Sa’id al-Khudri, his own brother Muhammad, and his brother-in-law and cousin ‘Abdullah ibn Jafar (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhuma) all remonstrated with him and tried to persuade him not to go to Iraq. His mind, however, was made up. He set out from Makkah on the 8th of Dhul-Hijjah, not knowing of the sad end of Muslim ibn ‘Aqil.

After a difficult journey of almost a month, al-Husayn’s (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) party reached Iraq. It was there that he first heard of the treachery of the Kufans and the deaths of Muslim ibn ‘Aqil and Qays ibn Mus-hir. Prior to his arrival in Iraq a large number of desert Arabs had attached themselves to his party, thinking that Kufah was already (practically) his. Al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) addressed them, saying, “Our Shi’ah (supporters) have deserted us. Therefore, whoever wants to leave is free to do so.” Soon he was left with only those who left Makkah with him, and together they continued towards Kufah.

Meanwhile Kufah was placed under heavey surveillance by Ibn Ziyad. When news of al-Husayn’s (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) approach reached him, he dispatched a 4000 strong contingent, which was on its way to fight the Daylamites, to stop al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu). This contingent was put under the command of ‘Umar ibn Sa’d. There can be little doubt that the Kufans witnessed the departure of this force from Kufah with their own eyes. This was the final opportunity to rush to the side of the grandson of Rasulullah. It was after all, their invitations and assurances of support that encouraged him to abandon the safety of Makkah for the precarious battlefields of Iraq. But once again faith, courage and commitment were found lacking in the people of Kufah. Only a handful emerged to join al-Husayn at Karbala’.

When the sun set on the 10th of Muharram, it was too late for the faithless Shi’ah of Kufah to make amends, for the sands of Karbala’ were stained red with the blood of al-Husayn (Radia-Allaahu ‘anhu) and his seventy-one followers. [Al-Bidayah wan-Nihayah by Ibn Kathir]


Source: "Who Killed Al-Hussein (Radia-Allaahu ‘Anhu)" available at 4theseekeroftruth.com from a pamphlet published by Mabarrat Aal wal-As-hab


The martyrdom of al-Husayn and the general atmosphere of mourning amongst the Shia during the month of Muharram bears testimony to its importance in the Shi’i calendar. To the Shia, ‘Ashura’ is probably the most important day of the year.

In this partial account of what actually happened at Karbala’, which conveniently draws attention away from the other guilty party in the ‘Ashura’ tragedy, lies another tragedy in itself. For while al-Husayn’s martyrdom has been oft commemorated, and his physical opponents and killers identified, cursed and eliminated, no one has spared a moment’s anger for those who deserted him at the crucial hour. It is these men in the shadows, who squarely deserve to be called the real villains of Karbala’, upon whom this article seeks to cast light - the Shia of Kufah.





Shia authorities, historians and writers confirm that it was the Shia of Kufah, after deserting al-Husayn, and acting treacherously even though the pledge of allegiance they had given was still around their necks, came to kill him and take his family captive. The following quotes are all from Shia authorities.

The advice of Muhammad bin al-Hanafiyyah, the brother of al-Husayn, who said to al-Husayn:
O my brother, you already know the treachery of the people of Kufah towards your father and brother. And I fear that your affair will be the same as that of he who has already passed." ]al-Malhoof of Ibn Tawoos (p. 39), Aashooraa of al-Ihsaa'ee (p. 115), al-Majaalis al-Faakhirah of Abd al-Husayn (p. 75), Muntahaa al-Aamaal of Abbaas al-Qummee (1/454).]

The saying of al-Husayn about the Shia of Kufah:
O Allaah, judge between us and between a people who requested us to aid us, but who then killed us. [Muntahaa al-Aamaal of Abbaas al-Qummee (1/535)]

The Shia writer, Husayn al-Kawraani writes:
The people of Kufah did not suffice with splitting from al-Imaam al-Husayn, but the result of their changing their colours led to a third position which is that they began to prepare to depart to Karbalah in order to wage war against al-Imaam al-Husayn (alayhis salaam). And in Karbala they would hasten (racing each other) to take up their positions, those which pleased Shaytan and which anger al-Rahmaan (Allaah). For example we find that Amr bin al-Hajjaaj who only yesterday was prominent in Kufah as if he was the guardian of the sanctuary of Ahl al-Bayt, and a defender of them, and the one who led an army to save Haani bin Urwah, went on to stomach (gulped) all of his apparent position(s) in order to accuse al-Imam al-Husayn of exiting from the religion, let us reflect upon the following text: "And Amr bin al-Hajjaaj used to say to his companions, 'Fight the one who exited from the religion and separated from the jamaa'ah (meaning al-Husayn)...'." Fee Rihaab al-Karbalaa (pp. 60-61)

And al-Kawraani also writes:
And we find another stance indicating the hypocrisy of the people of Kufah, Abd Allaah bin Hawzah al-Tameemi came in front of al-Imaam al-Husayn (alayhis salaam) and shouted, "Is Husayn amongst you?" Yet he was from the people of Kufah and only yesterday was he from the Shia (party) of Alee (alayhis salaam) and it is possible that he was from amongst those who wrote to al-Imaam (al-Husayn) or from the group of Shabath and others who wrote (to al-Husayn from Kufah)... then he (comes and says) "O Husayn, receive glad tidings of the Fire..."! [Fee Rihab al-Karbalaa (p. 61)]

And another Shia author, Murtadaa Mutahhiree writes, answering the question he asks himself: How did the people of Kufah embark on fighting al-Husayn (alayhis salaam) despite their love of him and their sentimental attachment to him?:
And the answer is the awe and fear which had taken root upon the people of Kufah in general since the time of Ziyad and Mu'awiyah, and which increased and grew to alarming proportions upon the arrival of Ubayd Allaah [bin Ziyaad] who upon arrival immediately killed Maytham al-Timaar, Rasheed, Muslim and Haani ... [al-Malhamah al-Husayniyyah (3/47-48)]

The Shia, Kaadhim al-Ihsaa'ee al-Najafee says:
The army that set out to wage war against al-Imaam al-Husayin (alayhis salaam) were 300,000 (in number) all of them were from the people of Kufah. There was not amongst them any Shaamee, Hijaazee, Hindee, Baakistaanee, Sudaanee, Misree, or Afreeqee. Rather, all of them were from the people of Kufah and they had gathered together from many diverse tribes. [Aashooraa (p. 89)]

The Shia historian, Husayn bin Ahmad al-Baraaqee al-Najafee said:
Al-Qazweenee said: And from that which for which scorn was shown to the people of Kufah was that they reviled al-Hasan bin Ali (alayhimaa as-salaam), and killed al-Husayn (alayhis salaam) after they themselves had invited him (to be their leader). [Taareekh al-Kufah (p. 113)]

And the Shia reference point, Aayat Allaah al-Udhmaa Muhsin al-Ameen said:
Then 20,000 from the people of Iraq who had given the pledge of allegiance to al-Husayn acted treacherously to him, revolted against him whilst their pledge of allegiance was around their necks, and killed him.

And Jawaad Muhdithee said:
And Imaam al-Hasan was faced by them with treachery, and Muslim bin Aqeel was killed unjustly whilst in their midst and al-Husayn was killed whilst languishing in Karbala, close to Kufah and at the hands of the army of Kufah.

Numerous Shia authorities, from their Shaykhs, quote from Ali bin al-Husayn bin Ali bin Abi Taalib (known as Zayn al-Aabideen) that he addressed the Shia who deserted his father and killed him, reviling them, saying:
O people, we implore you by Allaah, do you know that you wrote to my father and you deceived him and you gave him the pledge, the covenant, and you killed him and deserted him? So may you perish for what you have sent forth for yourselves, and for your evil opinionn. With which eye will you look towards the Messenger of Allaah (sallallaahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam) when he says to you, "You killed my family, and you violated my sanctity, so you are not from me." [Al-Tabarsee in al-Ihtijaaj (2/32), Ibn Taawoos in al-Malhoof (p. 92), al-Ameen in al-Lawaa'ij al-Ashjaann (p. 158), Abbaas al-Qummee in Muntahaa al-Aamaal (1/572), Husayn Kawrani in Fee Rihaab al-Karbalaa (p. 183), Abd al-Razzaaq al-Muqrim in Maqtal Husayn ((p. 317), Murtadaa Iyaad in Maqtal Husayn (p. 87) and Ridhaa al-Qawzeenee in Tadhlim al-Zahraa (p. 262), Abbaas al-Qummee in Nafs al-Mahmoom (p. 360)]

And when Ali bin al-Husayn Zayn al-Aabideen (rahimahullaah) saw the people of Kufah wailing and crying, he rebuked them, saying:
You wail and cry for us, so who are the ones who killed us? [Maqtal Husayn of Murtadaa Iyaad (p. 83), Tadhlim al-Zahraa of al-Qazweenee (p. 257) and al-Malhoof of Ibn Taawoos (p. 86), Nafs al-Mahmoom of Abbaas al-Qummee (p. 357)]

And in another narration that he was passing by them and he was ill and he said in a weak voice:
Are you wailing and crying for us? Who are the ones who killed us? [Abbaas al-Qummee in Muntahaa al-Aamaal (1/570)]

And in another narration that he said:
These people cry over us but who killed us other than them? [Al-Ihtijaaj of al-Tabarsee (2/29)]

And Shia sources quoted Umm Kulthum bint Ali (radiallaahu anhumaa) as saying:
O people of Kufah, disgrace upon you. What is with you that you deserted Husayn and killed him and you plundered his wealth and inherited it, and you took his women as captives, and you caused him distress. May you perish and may you be annihilated ... what burden have you carried upon your backs and which blood have you shed ... you killed the best of men after the Prophet (sallallaahu alayhi wa aalihi) and mercy has been snatched from your hearts. [Nafs al-Mahmoom (p. 262), Maqtal Husayn of al-Muqrim (p. 316), Lawaa'ij al-Ashjaan (p. 157) and others.]

And the Shia, Asad Haydar quotes from Zaynab bint Ali bin Abi Taalib (radiallaahu anhumaa), which is also mentioned by al-Tabarsee in al-Ihtijaaj (2/29-30):
أما بعد يا أهل الكوفة، يا أهل الختل والغدر والخذل .. إنما مثلكم كمثل التي نقضت غزلها من بعد قوة أنكاثاً، هل فيكم إلا الصلف والعجب والشنف والكذب .. أتبكون أخي؟! أجل والله فابكوا كثيراً واضحكوا قليلاً فقد ابليتم بعارها .. وانى ترخصون قتل سليل خاتم النبوة 
To proceed, O people of Kufah, O people of deception, treachery and desertion ... your example is like she who spins (yarn) only to break it after its strength. Is there anything in you but bragging, amazement, rank hatred and lying ... do you cry for my brother?! Yes, by Allaah, cry much and laugh little, for you have been put to trial through its infamy ... and how do you consider cheap the killing of the descendant of the Seal of the Prophethood. [Ma'al-Husayn Fee Nahdatihi (p. 295)]

Muhsin al-Ameen al-Husaynee al-Aaamilee says in his book "Fee Rihaab A'immah Ahl al-Bayt" (1/9):
Zahar bin Qays, he participated in the [battles] of al-Jamal and Siffeen with Ali (alayhis salaam), and Shabath bin Rub'ee and Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan al-Diyaabee also witnessed [the battle] of Siffeen with him. Then they waged war against al-Husayn (alayhis salaam) on the day of Karbalaa, so it was an evil end (soo' al-khaatimah) for them and we seek refuge in Allaah from the evil end.

And in the book al-Irshaad of the well-known and famous Shia scholar, al-Shaykh al-Mufeed (2/95-96 onwards) mentions those who set out to fight and kill Husayn:
وأصبح عمر بن سعد في ذلك اليوم وهو يوم الجمعة وقيل يوم السبت، فعبأ أصحابه وخرج فيمن معه من الناس نحو الحسين عليه السلام وكان على ميمنته عمرو بن الحجاج، وعلى ميسرته شمر بن ذي الجوشن، وعلى الخيل عروة بن قيس، وعلى الرجالة شبث بن ربعي، وأعطى الراية دريدا مولاه 
And Umar bin Sa'd arose that morning, and it was the day of Jumu'ah (Friday), and it is said it was Saturday and he mobilized his companions, and then set out with those people who were with him towards the direction of al-Husayn (alayhis salaam), and on his right was Amr bin al-Haaj, and on his left was Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan, and in charge of the horsemen was Urwah bin Qays and in charge of the infantry was Shabath bin Rub'ee and he gave the flag to Durayd, his mawlaa.

Then over the next twenty or so pages he gives an account of the fighting, culminating in the killing of al-Husayn (radiallaahu anhu) by Shammar bin Dhil-Jawshan.

Comments

The sayings of Ahl al-Bayt to the Shia of Kufah, "You wail and cry over us, yet you are the ones who killed us" exposes the fraud, scam and sham that underlies the deen of the Shia which is based upon a ridiculous type of hatred and it is a sign of the lack of intelligence and of simple-mindedness (or otherwise a sign of the deranged maniac-like nature) of those who knowing full well that their own Shia ancestry killed al-Husayn (radiallaahu anhu), harbour the greatest of resentment and hatred towards those who do not share in their simpleton type understanding of history and do not share in their bloodthirsty type of rage, based upon a fake display of anger for the blood of al-Husayn, for they (their Shia ancestors) are the very people who killed al-Husayn after deserting him and being treacherous to him. Then this fake wailing, lamenting and crying became one of the bidahs of the Shia to this day of ours. Refer to the book "Man Qatala al-Husayn" by Abd Allaah bin Abd al-Azeez (Cairo) for further information.


Source: "Shia Authorities and Historians on Who Murdered al-Husayn" at www.shia.bs


Infallible Imam slams Taqqiyah against the wall

The books of the folks are full of Taqqiyah and conflicting reports from their “infallible” Imams to an extent that no matter is free from differences of opinion, their renowned scholar Ja’far al-Subhani says in “al-Rasael al-Arba’ah” pg.201:


عندما نطالع كتابي: الوسائل، والمستدرك مثلاً؛ نرى أنه ما من باب من أبواب الفقه إلا وفيه اختلاف في رواياته، وهذا مما أدى إلى رجوع بعض ممن استبصروا عن مذهب الإمامية
[When we read the two books (of Hadith): Wasael al-Shia and Mustadrak al-Wasael for example, we see that there is no chapter or Fiqhi section which is free from conflicting narrations, this has caused some of those who converted to the Imami Madhab to leave it.]
This matter has become so serious that some of their biggest scholars left the Madhab, such as the teacher of their leader al-Tusi, in “Rasael fi Dirayat al-Hadith” by abu al-Fadl al-Babili vol.2 pg.223 & in “Tahtheeb al-Ahkam” vol.1 pg.2:
ثم ذكر عن شيخه أبي الحسن الهاروني العلوي أنه كان يعتقد الحق ، ويدين بالإمامة ، فرجع عنها لما التبس عليه الأمر في اختلاف الأحاديث ، وترك المذهب .
[Then he(al-Tusi) mentions about his teacher abu al-Hassan al-Harouni al-'Alawi that he used to believe in the truth(Shia Madhab), and that he took Imamah as his religion, but he left it when he became confused because of the conflicting narrations, and he abandoned the Madhab.]
I say: the one who has opened their books of Hadith knows the gigantic amount of Hadiths that were labeled as Taqqiyah by the Shia scholars thinking that it would solve their problems, and MANY of these are authentic according to their standards, and this saves them the effort of having to make illogical and strange explanations in order to reconcile them. After reading these explanations one can only come to the conclusion that the Imam was on Taqqiyah most of his time, and this is indeed what many of their scholars stated in their books, and they said that even their closest companions never knew most of the religious rulings because the Imams would use Taqqiyah even on their own followers.
Their famous scholar and researcher Yusuf al-Bahrani said in “al-Hadaeq al-Nadirah” vol.1 pg.5:
فلم يعلم من أحكام الدين على اليقين إلا القليل، لامتزاج أخباره بأخبار التقية، كما اعترف بذلك ثقة الإسلام وعلم الأعلام محمد بن يعقوب الكليني نور الله مرقده في جامعه الكافي
[Only a small amount of the rulings of the religion were known for sure, because their narrations were mixed with the narrations of Taqqiyah, as was admitted by Thiqat al-Islam Muhammad bin Ya'aqoub al-Kulayni may Allah fill his grave with light in his collection al-Kafi]
So what we can conclude is that the Imams did Taqqiyah in just about everything, in all topics and all matters, for example:
وما رواه محمد بن أحمد بن يحيى عن أحمد بن محمد عن ابن سنان عن أبي الجارود قال: قلت لابي جعفر (ع) متى اسجد سجدتي السهو ؟ قال: قبل التسليم فانك إذا سلمت فقد ذهبت حرمة صلاتك. فالوجه في هذين الخبرين أن نحملهما على ضرب من التقية لانهما موافقان لمذاهب كثير من العامة
Muhammad bin Ahmad bin Yahya from Ahmad bin Muhammad from ibn Sinan from abu al-Jaroud: I said to abu Ja’far (as): “When do I make the two prostrations of forgetfulness?” he (as) said: “Before making Tasleem, because if you make Tasleem then your prayer is finished.”
Their scholar and leader al-Tusi commented on this narration and the others before it by saying: “These two narrations are to be considered a kind of Taqqiyah, because they agree with the Madhabs of many of the ‘Ammah(Sunnies).”
Sources:
Tahtheeb al-Ahkam by Tusi 2/195, Istibsar by Tusi 1/380, Wasael al-Shia by ‘Amili 8/208.
As you can see they consider the smallest matters to be Taqqiyah such as if the two prostrations of forgetfulness were before or after Tasleem, and the examples are many… BUT is it true that their Imams did Taqqiyah as their scholars would like us to believe? The life that these great men lived shows otherwise and I’ll be quoting an example from their own books again.
al-Kafi vol.5 pg.449:
عَلِيُّ بْنُ إِبْرَاهِيمَ عَنْ أَبِيهِ عَنِ ابْنِ أَبِي عُمَيْرٍ عَنْ عَلِيِّ بْنِ الْحَسَنِ بْنِ رِبَاطٍ عَنْ حَرِيزٍ عَنْ عَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنِ أَبِي عَبْدِ اللَّهِ قَالَ سَمِعْتُ أَبَا حَنِيفَةَ يَسْأَلُ أَبَا عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ( عليه السلام ) عَنِ الْمُتْعَةِ فَقَالَ أَيَّ الْمُتْعَتَيْنِ تَسْأَلُ قَالَ سَأَلْتُكَ عَنْ مُتْعَةِ الْحَجِّ فَأَنْبِئْنِي عَنْ مُتْعَةِ النِّسَاءِ أَ حَقٌّ هِيَ فَقَالَ سُبْحَانَ اللَّهِ أَ مَا قَرَأْتَ كِتَابَ اللَّهِ عَزَّ وَ جَلَّ فَمَا اسْتَمْتَعْتُمْ بِهِ مِنْهُنَّ فَآتُوهُنَّ أُجُورَهُنَّ فَرِيضَةً فَقَالَ أَبُو حَنِيفَةَ وَ اللَّهِ فَكَأَنَّهَا آيَةٌ لَمْ أَقْرَأْهَا قَطُّ .
‘Ali bin Ibrahim from his father from ibn abi ‘Umayr from ‘Ali bin al-Hassan bin Ribat from Hariz from ‘Abdul-Rahman bin abi ‘Abdullah: I heard abu Hanifa ask abu ‘Abdullah (as) about Mut’ah, so he (as) said: “Which of the two you ask about?” abu Hanifa said: “I am asking about the Mut’ah of women because I already asked you about the Mut’ah of Hajj, is it correct?” he (as) replied: “Subhanallah! Have you not read in the book of Allah (swt)? : {So for whatever you enjoy [of marriage] from them, give them their due compensation as an obligation.}” abu Hanifa said: “By Allah it is as if this is the first time I hear it.”
al-Majlisi said: Hasan in al-Miraat 20/229.
al-Behbudi said: Sahih in Sahih-ul-Kafi 3/45.
So I ask where is this infamous Taqqiyah you speak of? al-Sadiq wasn’t just talking to a random ignorant Muslim layman in the streets, nor was he talking about a small minor issue, he is talking about one of the biggest differences MUT’AH! and who is he talking to? he’s talking to the leader of the scholars of Baghdad and the head of one of the four Madhabs Imam abu Hanifa al-Nu’man!
There is no Taqqiyah, there are liars, many liars, and they have been deemed trustworthy and reliable by dishonest scholars of Rijal, that is the truth.

All taken from their books...

1. They said Allah will not speak to your sunni 'brothers', not purify them, and they will receive the painful azab... 

عن أبي عبد الله (عليه السلام) قال: سمعته يقول: ثلاثة لا يكلمهم الله يوم القيامة ولا يزكيهم ولهم عذاب أليم: من ادعى إمامة من الله ليست له، ومن جحد إماما من الله، ومن زعم أن لهما في الإسلام نصيبا.


...From Abu Abdullah he said, I heard him said : (( Three groups of people that Allah will not speak to them during the day of judgement : 1) One who claimed the Imamate from Allah while he's not,
2) One who rejected the Imam from Allah, 
and 3) The one who claimed that these two groups ( 1 & 2) have some portion of Islam.)) " [ Usul Kafi: Bab One who claimed to be the Imam while he is not, and one who rejects the imams or some of them, and one who attribute to someone as an imam while he is not ]. 




  • Nu'many in his book al-Ghaibah: " ...Muhamad bin Muslim said : I asked Abu Ja'far : " What do you say about someone who rejects an Imam from Allah, what is his status? He answered : " Whoever rejects an imam from Allah and disassociates himself from his(imam's) deen, then he is KAFIR, MURTAD from Islam, because the Imam from Allah and his deen is the deen of Allah, whoever disassociates himself from the the deen of Allah, then his blood is HALAL until he returns to repent to Allah from what he said."

     :Al-Majilisi said

      : " اعلم أن إطلاق لفظ الشرك والكفر على من لم يعتقد إمامة أمير - المؤمنين و الأئمة من ولده ع وفضل عليهم غيرهم يدل على أنهم كفار مخلدون في النار وقد مر الكلام فيه في أبواب المعاد وسيأتي في أبواب الإيمان والكفر إنشاء الله تعالى
    "
    " Know that the mention of the words Syirik and Kufur on those who didn't believe in the Imamate of Amirul Mukminin and the Imams from his offsprings, and their tafdheel(favouring) of others before them is proof that they are KUFFAR, FOREVER DWELLERS OF HELL, and this has been mentioned in the book of Ma'ad ( day after), and will be mentioned in the books of Iman and Kufur 
    God willing. "

    بحار الأنوار للمجلسي (1111 هـ) الجزء 23 صفحة 390 باب 21 : تأويل المؤمنين والإيمان


3. INFALLIBE ABU ABDULAH SAID: DON'T GIVE SADAQAH TO AHLI SUNNAH(NASIBITES) AND SYIAH ZAIDIYAH, DON'T FEED THEM WATER IF YOU CAN, FOR THEY ARE KUFFAR


روى الكشي أيضا عن حمدويه، عن ابن يزيد، عن محمد بن عمر، عن ابن عذافر، عن عمر بن يزيد قال: سألت أبا عبد الله عليه السلام عن الصدقة على الناصب وعلى الزيدية قال: لا تصدق عليهم بشئ، ولا تسقهم من الماء إن استطعت، وقال لي: الزيدية هم النصاب.
Majlisi narrating from Rijal Kashyi in Biharul Anwar :{37/34)

4. INFALLIBLE ABUL HASAN: NASIBI AND ZAIDI ARE THE SAME, BOTH DISBELIEVED IN QURAN, PROPHETS AND MESSENGERS
 الحسين بن محمد الأشعري عن علي بن محمد بن سعيد عن محمد بن 
سالم بن أبي سلمة عن محمد بن سعيد بن غزوان قال : حدثني عبد الله بن المغيرة قال : قلت لأبي الحسن: إن لي جارين أحدهما ناصب والآخر زيدي ولا بد من معاشرتهما فمن أعاشر فقال : هما سيان من كذب بآية من كتاب الله فقد نبذ الاسلام وراء ظهره وهو المكذب بجميع القرآن والأنبياء والمرسلين قال : ثم قال : إن هذا نصب لك وهذا الزيدي نصب لنا .

...from Abdullah bin Mughirah : " I asked Abul Hasasn : " I have two girl slaves, one a Nasibi, another a Zaidi, and I must mix with them, which one can I mix with?" 

He answered : " Both are the same! One who disbelieved a verse from the Book of Allah has thrown Islam behind him, he is a disbeliever to all of the Quran, all Prophets and Messengers." 

Then he said : " This is your enemy, and this Zaidi is our enemy."

[ Usul al-Kafi by Kulaini (329H) : 8/235 ]

5. INFALLIBLE ABU ABDULLAH SAID : ALLAH DO NOT ACCEPT HAJ FROM NON SYIAH..HAJ IS ONLY FOR SYIAH

- سهل بن زياد، عن محمد بن سنان، عن حماد بن أبي طلحة، عن معاذ بن كثير قال: نظرت إلى الموقف والناس فيه كثير فدنوت إلى أبي عبد الله (عليه السلام) فقلت له: إن أهل الموقف لكثير؟ قال:
فصرف ببصره فأداره فيهم ثم قال: ادن مني يا أبا عبد الله، غثاء يأتي به الموج من كل مكان لا والله ما الحج إلا لكم، لا والله ما يتقبل الله إلا منكم.

...from Muaz bin Katsir : " I looked at Arafah and people are many there..I neared to Abu Abdullah and told him : " Verily the people doing wuquf are so many?

He turned his look towards them, and then he said : " Come near me O Abu Abdillah, these are just DIRT from waves all over the place. No, I swear with Allah, hajj is only for you people. No, by Allah, Allah will not accept ( hajj ) except from you people."

[Usul Kafi by Kulaini ( 329H ) : 8/327 no 318.]

6. INFALLIBLE SAJJAD : " ONE WHO PRAYED THE LIFETIME OF NOAH A.S 950 YEARS BETWEEN RUKUN HAJAR ASWAD AND MAQAM, MEETS ALLAH WITHOUT OUR WILAYAH, IT WILL NOT BENEFIT HIM AT ALL."

[308] 12 ـ محمد بن علي بن الحسين، بإسناده، عن أبي حمزة الثمالي، قال: قال لنا علي بن الحسين ( عليه السلام ): أي البقاع أفضل؟ فقلنا: الله ورسوله وابن رسوله أعلم، فقال لنا: أفضل البقاع ما بين الركن والمقام، ولو أن رجلا عمر ما عمر نوح في قومه، ألف سنة إلا خمسين عاما، يصوم النهار، ويقوم الليل في ذلك المكان، ثم لقى الله بغير ولايتنا لم ينفعه ذلك شيئا.

...from Abu Hamzah: " Ali ibnul Husain ( Sajjad) said : " What is the best place on earth?" We said : " Allah, His Messenger and His Messenger's son know best "

He said to us : " The best place is between Rukun and Maqam, if a man's life is lengthened to the lifetime of Noah, 950 years, fasting in the day, praying at night at that place, then he dies meeting Allah without acknowledging our Wilayah, all (this worship) will not benefit him at all."

[Wasail Syiah : Bab : The Nullifucation of Ibadat Without the Wilayah of Imams And the Believe In Their Imamate : page 121 no 308. ]

7. INFALLIBLE ABU JA'FAR : ِALLAH WILL PUNISH ALL CITIZENS OF ISLAM ACCEPTING THE WILAYAH OF ANYL UNJUST IMAM NOT FROM ALLAH EVEN IF THERE WERE SOME CITIZENS HAVING VIRTUOUS DEEDS

- وعنه، عن هشام بن سالم، عن حبيب السجستاني، عن أبي جعفر (عليه السلام) قال: قال الله تبارك وتعالى: لاعذبن كل رعية في الاسلام دانت بولاية كل إمام جائر ليس من الله، وإن كانت الرعية في أعمالها برة تقية، ولاعفون عن كل رعية في الاسلام دانت بولاية كل إمام عادل من الله وإن كانت الرعيه في أنفسها ظالمة مسيئة.

...From Abu Ja'far : Allah said : " I will surely punish all citizens of Islam who accepted the wilayah of any unjust imam that is not from Allah, even if there are some citizens having virtuous deeds. 

And I will surely forgive all citizens of Islam who accepted the wilayah of the just imam from Allah, even if all of these citizens themselves were unjust and having evil deeds. "

[ Usul al-Kafi by Kulaini (329H) : Bab: One who accepted the Imam not from Allah: pg375 ]

8. THE INFALLIBLE ABU ABDULLAH: A SUNNI WHO EMBRACED SYIAH MUST REDO HIS HAJ AND REPAY HIS ZAKAT

[318] 2 ـ وعن عدة من أصحابنا عن سهل بن زياد وأحمد بن محمد جميعا، عن أحمد بن محمد بن أبي نصر، عن علي بن أبي حمزة، عن أبي بصير، عن أبي عبدالله ( عليه السلام ) قال ـ في حديث ـ: وكذلك الناصب إذا عرف، فعليه الحج وان كان قد حج.

...from Abu Baseer, from Abu Abdullah in a hadith : " So is the Nasibi who had known ( accepted the true Imam ), he must make hajj even if he had done so ( while being a non Syiah ) "

[317] 1 ـ محمد بن الحسن بإسناده عن موسى بن القاسم، عن صفوان وابن أبي عمير، عن عمر بن أذينة، عن بريد بن معاوية العجلي، عن أبي عبدالله ( عليه السلام ) ـ في حديث ـ قال: كل عمل عمله وهو في حال نصبه (1) وضلالته، ثم من الله عليه وعرفه الولاية، فإنه يؤجر عليه، إلا الزكاة فإنه يعيدها، لأنه وضعها في غير مواضعها، لأنها لأهل الولاية، وأما الصلاة، والحج، والصيام، فليس عليه قضاء.

...from Buraid bin Muawiyah al-Ijli, from Abu Abdullah in a hadith : " Every action while he was a Nasibi ( non Syiah Imamiyah) and in his deviance, then Allah guide him to the Wilayah , he will be rewarded for it EXCEPT ZAKAT, for he must repay it, because he payed it not to its proper place, because zakat is for Ahlil Wilayah ( Syiah only ), as for solat, hajj, fast, there is no need to qada' " 

I say, Nasib refers to all non Imamiyah, where Sunnis are the top of the list, and it includes all other brands of Syiah, not even Zaidis!

321] 5 ـ وفي ( الذكرى ) نقلا من كتاب علي بن إسماعيل الميثمي، عن محمد بن حكيم قال: كنت عند أبي عبدالله ( عليه السلام ) إذ دخل عليه كوفيان كانا زيديين، فقالا (1): إنا كنا نقول بقول، وإن الله من علينا بولايتك، فهل يقبل شيء من أعمالنا؟ فقال: أما الصلاة، والصوم، والحج، والصدقة، فإن الله يتبعكما ذلك ويلحق بكما، وأما الزكاة فلا، لأنكما أبعدتما حق امرىء مسلم، وأعطيتماه غيره.

...from Muhammad bin Hakeem: " I was with Abu Abdullah when two former Zaidis from Kufah entered and said : " We used to believe in a belief ( Zaidiyah ), then Allah granted us with your Wilayah, will any of our past actions be accepted?"

He answered : " As for solat, fast, haj and giving alms, Allah will count them and reward you, but as for ZAKAH, NO! Because you took away the right of a Muslim, and instead gave it to someone else. " "

Ref: Wasail Syiah :Bab : Not Compulsory to Redo Ibadat After Given Guidance ( to the Imamate ) Except Zakat If he Pays to the Unrightful one, and Haj If he leaves a rukun.

Note : There's a contradiction in the narrations above regarding The point is clear, these Syiahs look at others as Kuffar, doomed to Hell, that is what lies between those Syiah smiles.

9. THE INFALLIBLE ABU ABDULLAH : ONE WHO REJECTS THE WILAYAH IS LIKE THE WORSHIPPER OF AN IDOL

Majlisi narrates in his Biharul Anwar : 
0 - بصائر الدرجات : أحمد بن الحسين عن أحمد بن إبراهيم عن الحسن بن البراء عن علي ابن حسان عن عبد الرحمان يعني ابن كثير قال : حججت مع أبي عبد الله ع فلما صرنا في بعض الطريق صعد على جبل فأشرف فنظر إلى الناس فقال : ما أكثر الضجيج وأقل الحجيج ؟ فقال له داود الرقي : يا بن رسول الله هل يستجيب الله دعاء هذا الجمع الذي أرى ؟ قال : ويحك يا با سليمان إن الله لا يغفر أن يشرك به الجاحد لولاية علي كعابد وثن . قال : قلت : جعلت فداك هل تعرفون محبكم ومبغضكم ؟ قال : ويحك يا أبا سليمان إنه ليس من عبد يولد إلا كتب بين عينيه : مؤمن أو كافر وإن الرجل ليدخل إلينا بولايتنا وبالبراءة من أعدائنا فنرى مكتوبا بين عينيه : مؤمن أو كافر قال الله عز وجل : ( إن في ذلك لايات للمتوسمين ) نعرف عدونا من ولينا

...from Abdur Rahman ibnu Kathir : " I performed haj with Abu Abdullah, while we were at some road he climbed a hill, taking the view and looked at the people and said : " What a lot of noise and so few Hujjaj?

Daud ar-Raqiy said to him : " O son of Rasulullah! Will Allah answer prayers of these people that I see?

He answered : " Destruction on you O Abu Sulaiman! Verily Allah will not forgive those who is a musyrik, ONE WHO REJECTS THE WILAYAH OF ALI IS LIKE THE WORSHIPPER OF AN IDOL!"

I said : " May I be your ransom! Do you ( Imams ) know your lovers and your haters? "

He answered : " Destruction on you O Abu Sulaiman! There is not a single baby born except that it was written between his eyes ' Mukmin' or ' Kafir '. And verily, a man enters to our place with our Wilayah and the rejection of our enemies while we SEE wirtten between his eyes : ' Mukmin ' or 'Kafir'...""

[ Biharul Anwar : 27/181. Bab : Actions Are not Accepted Without Wilayah ]

10. THE INFALLIBLE SAJJAD : ABU BAKAR AND UMAR ARE KAFIRS, KAFIR ONE WHO LOVES THEM!

. روى الشيخ الجليل أبي الصلاح الحلبي (رضي الله عنه) بسنده: عن أبي علي الخراساني عن مولى لعلي بن الحسين عليهما السّلام قال: كنت مع علي بن الحسين عليه السّلام في بعض خلواته؛ فقلت إنّ لي عليك حقّا، ألا تخبرني عن الرجلين، عن أبي بكر وعمر؟
فقال: كافران، كافر من أحبّهما.
(تقريب المعارف للحلبي ص244).

The ' beloved' Majlisi reported in his al-Bihar : " Syaikh Abu Solah ah-Halabi narrated with his sanad : from Ali al-Khurasani, from Maula to Ali bin al-Husain ( Sajjad ):

" I was in private with Ali bin Husain and I said : " I have a right on you that you must tell me about the two men, Abu Bakar and Umar?"

He answered : " Both are KAFIRS, and kafir anyone who loves them!" "

[ Biharul Anwar : 29/137 Bab : The Kufur of the Mukhalifin and Nasibis ]

11. THE INFALLIBLE SAJJAD : ABU BAKAR AND UMAR ARE KAFIRS, KAFIR ONE WHO LOVES THEM!

. روى الشيخ الجليل أبي الصلاح الحلبي (رضي الله عنه) بسنده: عن أبي علي الخراساني عن مولى لعلي بن الحسين عليهما السّلام قال: كنت مع علي بن الحسين عليه السّلام في بعض خلواته؛ فقلت إنّ لي عليك حقّا، ألا تخبرني عن الرجلين، عن أبي بكر وعمر؟
فقال: كافران، كافر من أحبّهما.
(تقريب المعارف للحلبي ص244).

The ' beloved' Majlisi reported in his al-Bihar : " Syaikh Abu Solah ah-Halabi narrated with his sanad : from Ali al-Khurasani, from Maula of Ali bin al-Husain ( Sajjad ):

" I was in private with Ali bin Husain and I said : " I have a right on you that you must tell me about the two men, Abu Bakar and Umar?"

He answered : " Both are KAFIRS, and kafir is anyone who loves them!" "

[ Biharul Anwar : 29/137 Bab : The Kufur of the Mukhalifin and Nasibis ]

12. THE INFALLIBLE ABU JA'FAR : THE TWO SYAIKHS ( Abu Bakar and Umar ) DIED WITHOUT TAUBAH FOR WHAT THEY DID TO AMIRUL MUKMININ ( ALI ), THE CURSE OF ALLAH, THE ANGELS AND ALL MANKIND ON BOTH OF THEM

. حديث صحيح رواه الكليني (قدس الله نفسه) بسنده عن سدير الصيرفي عن أبي جعفر الباقر (عليه السلام) قال: ”إن الشيخين فارقا الدنيا ولم يتوبا ولم يتذكّرا ما صنعا بأمير المؤمنين عليه السلام، فعليهما لعنة الله والملائكة والناس أجمعين“. (الكافي ج8 ص246).

[ Kulaini in his al-Kafi : 8/ 246 ]

Our Objectives


Shia.sg was initiated by a group of concerned Muslims who were active in a Facebook group called "Kampung Melayu" which was mainly a platform for Singapore Muslims.


Unfortunately, the Facebook group admitted members from the local Shi'ite community, including their leader, Rosli Hassan.

>> Read more...

Local News about Deviant Shi'a Cult in M'sia


Self-Flagellation Ritual of Muharram


Most Read Articles